⚠️ This post links to an external website. ⚠️
For the past few decades, Engineering meant one thing: removing ambiguity. It meant defining strict interfaces, enforcing type safety, and ensuring that
Input A \+ Code B \= Output C.Traditional software engineering is Deterministic. We play the role of Traffic Controllers; we own the roads, the lights, and the laws. We decide exactly where data goes and when. Agent Engineering is Probabilistic. We are Dispatchers. We give instructions to a driver (an LLM) who might take a shortcut, get lost, or decide to drive on the sidewalk because it "seemed faster."
It is a paradox that junior engineers often ship functional agents faster than seniors. Why? The more senior the engineer, the less they tend to trust the reasoning and instruction-following capabilities of the Agent. We fight the model and try to "code away" the probabilistic nature.
Here are 5 examples where traditional engineering habits clash with the new reality of Agent Engineering.
continue reading on www.philschmid.de
If this post was enjoyable or useful for you, please share it! If you have comments, questions, or feedback, you can email my personal email. To get new posts, subscribe use the RSS feed.